ABFL holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 2 issuer countries.

ABFL's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 4.84% of net assets. Apple Inc and Vertiv Holdings Co follow; the three together are 13.31%. Ten companies are 30.95% of the fund; the other 49 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, ABFL behaves like 46.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 25 quarterly filings ABFL has become more concentrated: it behaved like 63.9 at 2020-04-30 and 43.6 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 17 positions were added and 24 dropped; 35.3% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-04-30 and 2026-04-30, ABFL went from behaving like 63.9 equally weighted positions to 43.6 — 32% fewer, while its top ten went from 23.82% to 32.89% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 59 positions in ABFL's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: ABFL.csv.gz.

Share of ABFL's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of ABFL's own filings, 75 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: ABFL.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $4m was out to 1 borrower.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter ABFL has filed, with each borrower: ABFL.json · all funds.

62 positions became 55: 17 added (30.6% of the fund at the later date), 24 dropped (25.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 35.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of ABFL compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: KLA Corp (2.87%), Cheniere Energy Partners LP (2.63%), Altria Group Inc (2.53%), Seagate Technology Holdings PL (2.41%), MYR Group Inc (2.27%), GE Vernova Inc (2.16%). Gone: Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc (2.22%), Pure Storage Inc (1.61%), Charles Schwab Corp/The (1.48%), Dollar Tree Inc (1.47%), Spotify Technology SA (1.47%), Adobe Inc (1.34%).

99.05% equity, 0.95% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of ABFL (46.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.