257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

VGT vs VTV: what actually overlaps

VGT and VTV: 13.46% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-05-31 and 2026-06-30), across 28 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

13.46%Overlap by weight
28Shared holdings
48.4Combined effective holdings
-48.6 vs VTV alone

The short version

Held alone, VGT behaves like 15.1 equally weighted positions and VTV like 97. Held together in equal size they behave like 48.4 — less diversified than holding VTV on its own. The two funds hold 28 of the same securities, 13.46% of a dollar by weight, so the pair buys those companies twice.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-05-31 and 2026-06-30), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
VGTVTV
Assets$172B$255B
Holdings306309
Effective holdings15.197
Top ten weight59.38%23.55%
Largest position16.83%4.86%
Priced at market (Level 1)100%100%
Reporting date2026-05-312026-06-30

Each fund on its own: VGT · VTV

Where the overlap actually is

28

The ten shared positions that account for the most of it, with what each fund holds of its own. Shared is the lesser of the two — the part that is held in common either way. Where the two columns diverge, one fund is making a larger bet on that company than the other, and holding both does not average it away.

CompanyVGTVTVShared
Micron Technology Inc 4.202% 4.857% 4.202%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.853% 1.555% 1.555%
Intel Corp 2.032% 1.047% 1.047%
International Business Machines Corp 1.083% 0.986% 0.986%
QUALCOMM Inc 1.086% 0.727% 0.727%
Analog Devices Inc 0.816% 0.722% 0.722%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.109% 0.506% 0.506%
Dell Technologies Inc 0.611% 0.471% 0.471%
Salesforce Inc 0.695% 0.455% 0.455%
Corning Inc 0.611% 0.368% 0.368%

What the difference is made of

81.75% · 85.23%

81.75% of VGT sits in companies VTV does not hold at all, and 85.23% of VTV in companies VGT does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in VGT (81.75%)
  • NVIDIA Corp
  • Apple Inc
  • Microsoft Corp
  • Broadcom Inc
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc
Only in VTV (85.23%)
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Exxon Mobil Corp
  • Walmart Inc

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
VGT 2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31 320 → 318 358.7% Micron Technology Inc 2.41% → 4.2%
VTV 2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30 313 → 310 131610.3% Micron Technology Inc 1.55% → 4.86%

Related comparisons

8

Other pairs involving VGT or VTV, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective
VGT vs XLK 78.84% 15.9
VGT vs VUG 55.65% 18.5
QQQM vs VGT 53.73% 23.4
VIG vs VTV 50.73% 100.7
QQQ vs VGT 50.6% 24.3
VOO vs VTV 43.67% 103.6
IVV vs VTV 41.44% 103.9
SMH vs VGT 40.51% 18.2

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.