257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

HYG vs LQD: what actually overlaps

HYG and LQD: 0.3% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-05-31), across 1 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

0.3%Overlap by weight
1Shared holdings
2369.3Combined effective holdings
+479.4 vs LQD alone

The short version

Held alone, HYG behaves like 907.5 equally weighted positions and LQD like 1889.9. Held together in equal size they behave like 2369.3 — 479.4 more than LQD on its own. They share only 1 securities, 0.3% of a dollar by weight, so the pair genuinely widens.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-05-31 and 2026-05-31), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
HYGLQD
Assets$20B$34B
Holdings1,3213,134
Effective holdings907.51889.9
Top ten weight3.57%2.41%
Largest position0.56%0.96%
Priced at market (Level 1)11.76%7.7%
Reporting date2026-05-312026-05-31

Each fund on its own: HYG · LQD

Where the overlap actually is

1

The ten shared positions that account for the most of it, with what each fund holds of its own. Shared is the lesser of the two — the part that is held in common either way. Where the two columns diverge, one fund is making a larger bet on that company than the other, and holding both does not average it away.

CompanyHYGLQDShared
BLACKROCK CASH FUNDS TREASURY SL AGENCY SHARES 0.299% 0.957% 0.299%

What the difference is made of

99.7% · 99.04%

99.7% of HYG sits in companies LQD does not hold at all, and 99.04% of LQD in companies HYG does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in HYG (99.7%)
  • 1261229 BC LTD
  • ECHOSTAR CORP
  • CLOUD SOFTWARE GRP INC
  • QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC
  • CLOUD SOFTWARE GRP INC
Only in LQD (99.04%)
  • ANHEUSER-BUSCH CO/INBEV
  • CVS HEALTH CORP
  • T-MOBILE USA INC
  • META PLATFORMS INC
  • AMAZON.COM INC

By country of issuer

2026-05-31

Where each fund's money sits by the issuer country its filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Two funds can share companies and still differ here, and a pair that looks diversified by name can be one country twice.

CountryHYGLQDDifference
United States 83.45% 88.14% −4.69
Canada 4.11% 2.41% +1.70
United Kingdom 1.78% 3.27% −1.49
Japan 1.21% 1.80% −0.59
Not stated in filing 1.54% 0.17% +1.37
Netherlands° 1.16% 0.89% +0.27
Bermuda° 1.11% 0.00% +1.11
France 1.07% 0.40% +0.67
Luxembourg° 0.93% 0.15% +0.78
Cayman Islands° 0.91% 0.00% +0.91

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
HYG 2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31 1,342 → 1,322 9311312.8% SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.11% → 0.31%
LQD 2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31 3,093 → 3,136 16912616.2% MORGAN STANLEY 0.01% → 0.1%

Written about this pair

1

This page is the measurement. These essays argue about what it means, with the figures as they stood when each was written.

Related comparisons

0

Other pairs involving HYG or LQD, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.